New York Supreme Court, 1894

People ex rel. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Wemple

People ex rel. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Wemple
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 8, 1894 · Mayham, Putnam
29 N.Y.S. 99 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Lowry, Stone & Auerbach (Julien T. Davies and Wm. A. Poste, of counsel), for relator., T. E. Hancock, Atty. Gen. (John W. Hogan, Dep. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for respondent.

People ex rel. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Wemple

Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, J.

I think the determination of the comptroller should be reversed, with the usual costs, for the reasons stated in opinion in case between the same parties, and standing as No. 2 on the calendar. 29 N. Y. Supp. 92.

HERRICK, J., concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

MAYHAM, P. J.

(dissenting). This case does not differ essentially from one of the same title argued with this, and standing as No. 2 on the calendar (29 N. Y. Supp. 92), which has been considered and disposed of at this term, and consequently no opinion is required herein. The determination of the comptroller is confirmed, with $50 costs and printing disbursements in favor of the respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.