New York Supreme Court, 1894

Lee v. Timken

Lee v. Timken
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 12, 1894
30 N.Y.S. 800; 81 Hun 81; 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 764 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

V. W. Kingsley, for appellant., Geo. E. Mott, for respondent.

Lee v. Timken

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As we have had occasion to point out In the case of Sheffield v. Robinson (decided herewith) 30 N. Y. Supp. 799, an order sustaining or overruling a demurrer is not appealable; the appeal must be from the judgment. Appeal accordingly dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.