New York Supreme Court, 1894

Pike v. Wasserman

New York Supreme Court · Decided October 12, 1894

30 N.Y.S. 952; 81 Hun 78; 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 78; 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 117 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles Strauss, for appellant., Gratz Nathan, for respondents.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Both being actions in the supreme court, there seems to be no doubt but that this court has the power to restrain the trial of one until the final disposition of the other, if justice demands it. We think, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed, and order granted restraining the trial of the action *954subsequently brought until the final determination of the action first instituted; $10 costs and disbursements of the appeal to the appellant

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.