New York Supreme Court, 1894

In re Lord's Estate

In re Lord's Estate
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 16, 1894
30 N.Y.S. 1117 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

E. 0. Perkins, for appellant., A. E. Woodruff, for respondent.

In re Lord's Estate

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The court, upon a practice motion, has no power to make an order of reference to hear and determine. The only order which can be made is to take the testimony, and report with his •opinion. Upon the merits we are of opinion that the court had no authority to strike out relevant averments simply because they are claimed to be untrue. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.