New York Supreme Court, 1894

Read v. Mills

Read v. Mills
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 10, 1894 · Dykman
31 N.Y.S. 1132; 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613; 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. A. Thompson, lor appellant., Watts & Chadsey, for respondent.

Read v. Mills

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an action to recover for the services and disbursements of a lawyer who is now dead. The cause was tried before a referee, who has made a report in favor of the plaintiff, upon which a judgment has been entered. The defendant has appealed from the judgment. Without exception, the case involved questions of fact only, and the referee has made a'very careful examination of the testimony. We are satisfied with his conclusions both upon the point of law raised and the questions, of fact presented. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.