Manhattan Railway Co. v. Kent
Manhattan Railway Co. v. Kent
87 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 559; 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 569
Opinion of the Court
The proceedings before the condemnation commissioners were not the trial contemplated by the statute. Such proceedings were a mere assessment of damages. The trial spoken of in the statute is that which takes place preliminary to the appointment of commissioners.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.