Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1894

Lee v. Timken

Lee v. Timken
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1894 · Brien, Brunt, Follett
88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 81

Counsel

V. W. Kingsley, for the appellant.., Geo. K. Mott, for the respondent.

Lee v. Timken

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

As we have had occasion to point out in the case of Sheffield v. Robinson (decided herewith*), an order sustaining or overruling a demurrer is not appealable; the appeal must be from the judgment.

Appeal accordingly dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Yan Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Follett, J"J.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

See Sheffield v. Murray, Impleaded, etc. (80 Hun, 555).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.