New York Supreme Court, 1895

Suydam v. Dunton

Suydam v. Dunton
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1895 · Dykman
32 N.Y.S. 333 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

P. H. Van Vechten, for appellant., Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson (P. R. Minrath, of counsel), for respondents.

Suydam v. Dunton

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge of this court in favor of the plaintiffs, against the defendant. The findings of facts and conclusions of law are full and satisfactory, and, with the opinion *335of the trial judge, render any enlargement here unnecessary. The judgment should be affirmed, upon the opinion of the court below, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.