Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1895

Prospect Park & C. I. Railroad v. Brooklyn, B. & W. E. Railroad

Prospect Park & C. I. Railroad v. Brooklyn, B. & W. E. Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1895 · Dykman
32 N.Y.S. 857 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and PRATT, JJ. Morria & Whitehouse, for appellants., Wingate, Cullen & Miller (Geo. W. Wingate, of counsel), for respondent.

Prospect Park & C. I. Railroad v. Brooklyn, B. & W. E. Railroad

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

We are " entirely satisfied with the disposition made of this case at the special term, and with the reasons therefor *859contained in the opinion delivered at the special term. The case depends upon a peculiar state of facts, and there seems to be no necessity for making any addition to the opinion of the trial judge, and the judgment should be affirmed upon that opinion, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.