Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1895

In re Hall

In re Hall
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 5, 1895 · Dykman
32 N.Y.S. 883; 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620; 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 201 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John F. Brennan, for appellant., James A. O’Gorman, for respondent

In re Hall

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the city court

of Mt. Vernon, punishing Gilbert Hall for contempt of court. The contempt consisted in an interposition of a false answer in an action in that court in favor of Henry B. Jenkins and John Carmody against Gilbert Hall and Wright Hall (32 N. Y. Supp. ubi supra) The answer was false, and all the facts and circumstances show that Gilbert Hall knew it to be so. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.