New York Supreme Court, 1895

Birch v. Loyd

Birch v. Loyd
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1895 · Dykman
32 N.Y.S. 1139; 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609; 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John G. Van Etten, for appellants. John O. R. Taylor, for respondent.

Birch v. Loyd

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

There are three appeals in this case,—one from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the defendant after a trial at the circuit, one from the order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court, and one from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence,—and the appeals are all entirely destitute of merit. Justice has been done, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes should be affirmed, with costs, and the order denying the motion for a new trial upon newly-discovered evidence should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without an opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.