Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1895

Dadirrian v. Theodorian

Dadirrian v. Theodorian
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1895 · Pratt
32 N.Y.S. 1141; 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 296; 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 872 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Action by Dadirrian against Theodorian., Clark Bell, for appellant. Betts, Hyde & Betts, for respondent.

Dadirrian v. Theodorian

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

The question presented by this appeal is not free from difficulty; but there are some considerations which strongly favor the plaintiff, who seems to have expended considerable money in bringing his article into public notice. Such discretion as the special term may exercise is not willingly interfered with, and the trial upon the merits which either party can speedily bring on will afford a more satisfactory decision than can be had upon affidavits. Order affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.