New York Supreme Court, 1895

Miller v. Larmer

Miller v. Larmer
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1895
32 N.Y.S. 1146; 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 313; 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. B. Cruikshank, for appellants. A. A. Spear, for respondent.

Miller v. Larmer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, not having served or filed exceptions to the decision of the special term, are not in a position to challenge the findings of fact or the conclusions of law. The exceptions taken by the appellants to the reception and exclusion of evidence were not argued at the bar of this court, nor on their brief, and, besides, none of them are tenable. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.