New York Supreme Court, 1895

People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker

People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 11, 1895
33 N.Y.S. 190; 86 Hun 240; 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 240; 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 864 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

David J. Dean, for appellants., Charles H. Beckett, for respondent.

People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded that, after the assessment books •were opened for correction and review, the relator applied for a ■reduction of the assessment made against it, which was granted by the tax commissioners, and the assessment reduced from $500,000 to $221,153. Subsequently, and without notice, and upon evidence satisfactory to them, the assessment was increased to $357,468.13. This, we think, was error, because, having corrected the assessment, they were without authority to thereafter increase is, except upon 20 days’ notice to the relator. Laws 1882, c. 410, § 819.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.