New York Supreme Court, 1895

Van Arsdale v. King

Van Arsdale v. King
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 13, 1895 · Dykman
33 N.Y.S. 858; 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617; 67 N.Y. St. Rep. 611 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Norman A. Lawlor, for appellant, Isaac N. Mills, for respondent

Van Arsdale v. King

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the special term denying a motion to vacate an order made at the Westchester county special term on the 6th day of December, 1890, granting leave to bring this action, and to set aside and vacate all the proceedings subsequent thereto, including the judgment entered in this action.

The great delay in making this motion would be a sufficient justification of its denial. But, aside from the delay, the motion was entirely destitute of merit. At most, there was only irregularity in the original motion for leave to sue. The merits are all with the plaintiff, and no injustice has been wrought. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.