Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1895

City of Syracuse v. Stacey

City of Syracuse v. Stacey
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 4, 1895
33 N.Y.S. 942; 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 619; 67 N.Y. St. Rep. 719 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

C. L. Stone, W. A. Beach, and Geo. N. Kennedy, for appellant., Knapp, Nottingham & Andrews, George Barrow, and Charles A. Hawley, for respondents.

City of Syracuse v. Stacey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as we have reached the conclusion at this term, for the reasons stated in the opinion of HARDIN, P. J., in City of Syracuse v. Stacey, 33 N. Y. Supp. 929, that the order of confirmation and the judgment of the special term appointing commissioners should be reversed, and the appraisal vacated and set aside, it follows as a sequence that the order awarding costs to the respondents against the plaintiffs, and an extra allowance, in so far as it is appealed from, should fall and be vacated. Order, so far as it awards costs and an extra allowance to any of the respondents against the plaintiff, vacated and set aside.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.