New York Supreme Court, 1895

Wright v. Chapin

Wright v. Chapin
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 17, 1895
33 N.Y.S. 1068; 67 N.Y. St. Rep. 771 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

H. B. Closson, for appellant., Arthur C. Rounds, for respondent.

Wright v. Chapin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant seems to be greatly distressed by the fear that, in case he pays this judgment, the plaintiff may decamp with the money, and the defendant left to pay the Canadian judgment of a like amount. Should the defendant pay the Canadian judgment, and so relieve the plaintiff in this action from his liability on his covenant to George Goodwin, there might be a way found of reducing the present judgment by the amount paid on the Canadian judgment, without making double payment. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of this court reported in 74 Hun, 521, 26 N. Y. Supp. 825, and on the opinion of Mr. Justice INGRAHAM rendered on the trial of this action.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.