New York Supreme Court, 1895

Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 11, 1895 · Guriab
33 N.Y.S. 1128; 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618; 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

S. Babcock, for appellants., E. BI. Elelt, for respondent.

Goetting v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER GURIAB1.

The only question which it is necessary to consider is that in regard to the amount of the award. The other points which have been raised upon this appeal have been disposed of in. previous cases, and it is not necessary now to rediscuss them. We think, upon an examination of the testimony, that the award is larger than the evidence warranted. It seems to us that the same should be reduced to the sum of $1,500 fee damage, and $931.50 rental damage, and for these amounts the judgments should be affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.