New York Supreme Court, 1895

People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Barker

People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Barker
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 11, 1895
33 N.Y.S. 1132; 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618; 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

David J. Dean, for appellants., Julien T. Davies, for respondent.

People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Barker

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon an examination of the facts disclosed by the record upon appeal herein, we are unable to perceive any substantial difference between the case at bar and that of People v. Barker, 144 N. Y. 94, 39 N. E. 13. With a change of figures, the opinion seems entirely applicable to the facts and circumstances presented by the record before us. Following the conclusion reached in that case by the court of appeals, it would seem that the tax commissioners had a right to levy the assessment which they did, and the order vacating the same was erroneous. The order appealed from should be reversed, wth costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.