New York Supreme Court, 1895

Van Orden v. Krouse

Van Orden v. Krouse
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 26, 1895 · Dykman
34 N.Y.S. 1004; 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1; 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 839 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Garrett Z. Snider, for appellant., W. F. Wyckoff, for respondent.

Van Orden v. Krouse

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an equitable action to impress a trust upon certain real property belonging to Mary M. Krouse, deceased, at the time of her death, for her funeral expenses. She died intestate, and the .plaintiff, who was an undertaker, buried her and furnished all the necessary articles for her funeral and interment. The plaintiff was not employed to render the services or furnish the articles. The husband of the deceased is insolvent, and she died intestate. No administrator of the estate has been appointed, and the plaintiff desires to have his claim declared tó be a lien upon the real *1005property of the deceased. There was a demurrer to the complaint for insufficiency, which was sustained, and the plaintiff has appealed from the judgment sustaining the demurrer. There is no legal principle upon which this action can be maintained, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.