New York Supreme Court, 1895

McAvoy v. Kings County

McAvoy v. Kings County
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 26, 1895 · Dykman
34 N.Y.S. 1024; 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610; 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 105 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Wm. H. Law, for appellant., George F. Elliott, for respondent Kings county., F. H. Van Vechten, for respondent Queens county.

McAvoy v. Kings County

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

The counsel for the respective parties to this action have stipulated that the issues involved in the appeal in this action are identical with the issues involved in the case of Ahem v. Kings Co., 34 N. Y. Supp. 1023, and requested the general term to dispose of the appeal in this action in the same way as it may dispose of the appeal in the Case of Ahem. As the judgment in the action of Ahern has been affirmed at this term, so the judgment in this action of McAvoy must be affirmed according to the stipulation, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.