New York Supreme Court, 1895

Burrows v. McMurray

Burrows v. McMurray
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 26, 1895 · Pratt
34 N.Y.S. 1135; 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609; 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 867 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Oscar E. Danger, for appellant., "Hirsh & Rasquin, for respondents;

Burrows v. McMurray

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

This complaint was held insufficient, on motion to dismiss at the trial, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It sought to vacate the credentials of four out of five delegates chosen by the Fifteenth Ward Republican Association of Brooklyn to the Republican General Committee of Kings County. Neither the association, +he general committee, nor any individual representing it, nor either of the four individuals whose credentials are attacked are parties. The only ground alleged against the four delegates or their credentials is that, “under the constitution and by-laws, they are incompetent and disqualified from occupying the position.” The provisions of the constitution and by-laws bearing upon competency or qualifications are not stated, nor is it alleged that any such provisions exist. Other difficulties might be stated. Without going into detail, it is plain that the conclusions of the learned trial judge were correct. Judgment affirmed, with coste.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.