New York Supreme Court, 1895

Helmprecht v. Bowen

Helmprecht v. Bowen
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 14, 1895
34 N.Y.S. 1141; 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 362; 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Robert Goeller, for appellant., Blair & Rudd, for respondent.

Helmprecht v. Bowen

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order should be affirmed. It is evident from the affidavits of the plaintiff that he is reckless in his averments. The court is not required to assign an attorney designated by the party applying. Furthermore. the proposed. attorney in the case at bar nowhere agrees to conduct the action "-n. out compensation, as required by section 460 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.