New York Supreme Court, 1895

Hill v. Westcott

Hill v. Westcott
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 26, 1895 · Pratt
34 N.Y.S. 1141; 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 606 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Backus & Manne, for appellant., B. F. Chedsey, for respondent.

Hill v. Westcott

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

It seems clear that the contract in question herein was a specific contract between Westcott on the one side and Hill and Harrison on the other, wherein Westcott agreed to pay Hill and Harrison 10 cents per can cartage on milk carted by them from their creamery at Sidney to the station at the same place, and shipped over certain specified lines of railroad. The milk was shipped as per this agreement. We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with ■costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.