Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1895

Huffington v. Farrel

Huffington v. Farrel
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1895
35 N.Y.S. 1109; 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610; 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 887 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Thomas Darlington, for appellants. Charles H. Knox, for respondent.

Huffington v. Farrel

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the court of appeals delivered on a former appeal (100 N. Y. 179, 2 N. E. 915) required the action taken by the trial judge, and commands an affirmance of the judgment on this review. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.