New York Supreme Court, 1895

Weill v. Malone

Weill v. Malone
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 2, 1895 · Dykman
36 N.Y.S. 114 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Chandler & Kremer (Frederic S. Barnum and Eugene G. Kremer, of counsel), for appellants., Charles J. Patterson, for defendant Halstead., James O. Church, for defendants Malone and others.

Weill v. Malone

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of a justice of this court after a trial at the special term, and also from an order denying a motion of the plaintiffs’ to open the judgment. The facts are recited in the opinion of the trial judge, and, as we concur in his conclusions, a recitation of the case by us would be unprofitable.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the trial judge, and, as the appeal from the order is destitute of merit, it should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.