New York Supreme Court, 1895

Beebe v. NEW YORK & N. E. Railroad

Beebe v. NEW YORK & N. E. Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 2, 1895 · Pratt
36 N.Y.S. 1122; 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 294; 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 898 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Walter C. Anthony, for appellant., John M. Gardner, for respondent.

Beebe v. NEW YORK & N. E. Railroad

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury. There is no order in the record denying a new trial upon the judge’s minutes, and no certificate that the case contains all the evidence given upon the trial; therefore, under the rule, all wo can consider upon this appeal are questions of law contained in the record. Upon examining the case there only appears one exception, to wit, that at folio 143, to a question put by the court, which was clearly competent. Under these circumstances there is no alternative to an affirmance of the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.