New York Supreme Court, 1895

Doig v. Haverly

Doig v. Haverly
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 26, 1895
37 N.Y.S. 455; 92 Hun 176 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Neish & More, for appellant., A. G. Patterson, for respondents.

Doig v. Haverly

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

At the close of the evidence given in the case the parties expressly waived a jury, and submitted the questions of fact and of law to the court. Thereafter findings of fact were mad.e, and a conclusion of law stated. We are of the opinion that the evidence warranted the finding of fact made by the trial judge. The questions of law are clearly and fully discussed in an opinion delivered by the trial judge, which meets with our approval, and we therefore affirm the judgment upon the opinion of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of PARKER, J., delivered at the circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.