Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1895

First National Bank v. Eaton

First National Bank v. Eaton
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1895 · Hardin, Martin, Merwin
92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106

Counsel

H. O. Cook, for the appellant^., A. E. Kilby, for the respondent.

First National Bank v. Eaton

Opinion of the Court

Hardin, P. J.:

As the appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to a part of defendants’ answer, and no appeal is taken from any interlocutory judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. (Code, § 1349; Cambridge Valley Nat. Bank v. Lynch, 16 N. Y. 514; Sheffield, v. Robinson, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 163; S. C., sub nom. Sheffield v. Mur*107ray, 80 Hun, 555; Lee v. Timkin, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 764; S. C., 81 Hun, 81; Haffey v. Lynch, 68 id. 506.)

Tbe appeal should be dismissed.

Martin and Merwin, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed, without costs. (See 68 Hun, 506.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.