New York Supreme Court, 1895

Haines v. Patterson

Haines v. Patterson
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1895 · Brien, Brunt, Parker
94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 109

Counsel

A. Davidson, for the appellants., Christopher Fine and Chas. Fox, for the respondents.

Haines v. Patterson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The parties having delayed some fifteen years before making any attempt to collect their costs, we think it is too late now for them to move to amend a decree in an action in which they are not parties for the purpose of effecting such collection.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Parker, JJ.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.