New York Supreme Court, 1896

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bruen

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bruen
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 14, 1896 · Dykman
39 N.Y.S. 220 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles A. Dryer, for plaintiff., Alexander J. Bruen (John F. Coffin, of counsel), for defendant.

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bruen

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is a motion to confirm the report of commissioners of appraisal, and the only objection to such confirmation which requires any attention has reference to the insertion, in the order appointing the commissioners, of the date for their first meeting. The commissioners, in their report, say they met on the day specified in the order, and it appeared upon the argument that the order as it was entered contained the date. My conclusion is that the object of the statute has been accomplished by the meeting of the *223commissioners, and the objection has been waived by the appearance of the defendant, and by proceeding before the commissioners without raising the objection. The report must therefore be confirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.