New York Supreme Court, 1897

Firth v. Rehfeldt

Firth v. Rehfeldt
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 11, 1897 · Gaynor
47 N.Y.S. 474 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Blandy, Mooney & Shipman, for appellant., Philip & Raymond, for respondent.

Firth v. Rehfeldt

Opinion of the Court

GAYNOR, J.

The defendant has the right to make up a case upon specific exceptions or questions, and to print only such evidence as relates thereto. She cannot be required to print the evidence for a *475review of the facts when she does not want such review. Let the case go back for settlement accordingly. I do not see why the respondent wants evidence printed to. review the facts. On the con- • trary, if the appellant does not want it, it is for the respondent to have the case so settled as to make that fact fully appear.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.