New York Supreme Court, 1898

In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad

In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1898 · Gaynor
25 Misc. 120; 53 N.Y.S. 1087

Counsel

George W. Sickels for motion., Alexander S. Lyman opposed.

In re Brooklyn Elevated Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Gaynor J.:

The property owners having failed to appear in the proceeding were not entitled to notice of any subsequent proceedings. A proceeding under the Condemnation Law to acquire title to real property is governed in that respect by the general rules applicable to actions and proceedings.. If there could be any doubt of this, it would be removed by reference to the said Law (secs. 3364, 3369, 3370).

There being no legal ground for opening the defaults, the motion must be denied for laches, especially as the awards in contested cases in the same locality were only for six cents.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.