New York Supreme Court, 1899

Petschaft v. Lubow

Petschaft v. Lubow
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1899 · Giegerich
27 Misc. 50; 57 N.Y.S. 251

Counsel

Goldfogle, Cohn & Lind, for motion., W. N. Loew, opposed.

Petschaft v. Lubow

Opinion of the Court

Giegerich, J.

The order of arrest is assailed solely upon the ground that the copies of the papers-served Upon the defendant at *51the time of arrest did not contain a jurat or verification. The original papers were not defective, and the order cannot be vacated for defects in the copies. Barker v. Cook, 40 Barb. 254; Bank of Havana v. Moore, 5 Hun, 624. Motion denied, but without costs.

Motion denied, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.