New York Supreme Court, 1899

People ex rel. Liatto v. Dunn

People ex rel. Liatto v. Dunn
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1899 · Truax
27 Misc. 71; 58 N.Y.S. 147

Counsel

Bachrach & Levy (Moses I. Falk, of counsel), for motion., L. W. Harburger, for Adolph Teitilbaum, opposed., Philip J. Britt, for Thomas J. Dunn, sheriff.

People ex rel. Liatto v. Dunn

Opinion of the Court

Truax, J.

Section 2884 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that where the plaintiff is ignorant of the name or part of the name of a defendant, that defendant may be designated in the summons by a fictitious name, or by so much of his name as is known, adding a description to identify the person intended. In this case the plaintiff saw fit to designate the defendant by the name of Joseph Litto and to state in the summons that the first name was fictitious, the real name being unknown to plaintiff. The plaintiff obtained judgment in the above-named action and has issued execution thereon and arrested one' Frank Liatto. The judgment was obtained by default. Under this judgment the plaintiff had no right to arrest Frank Liatto. The plaintiff herein claimed that the surname of the defendant was Litto and stated that the only part of the defendant’s name that he did not know was his Christian name and he must stand or fall by the correctness of his position in that respect.' Gannon v. Myars, 11 Civ. Pro. 187.

Writ is sustained, with costs, and the prisoner discharged.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.