In re the Final Settlement of the Accounts of Barker
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Barker was appointed .trustee, under a trust. deed executed by Alonzo 0. Yates and Leila M.. Yates, his wife.. Under the trust deed he was to apply the income, and, if.neces-' sary,' any part of the principal of the estate conveyed to him to ■the payment of certain indebtedness existing- against said Alonzo •at the time of the conveyance. He was to invest the balance and pay the income to Alonzo 0., during his lifetime. Upon the- death of said Alonzo 0., he was to pay the principal of such estáte, in case of no issue surviving him, one-half to the wife, and one-half to the mother. '
■ At the time he died the trustée had in his possession $4,933.18, . of which $254.69 was income of the trust property, and the balance . was derived from the sale of certain real estate conveyed to him under the trust deed. ' In addition to this the deceased left a personal estate, amounting to at least $1,000',. .of which no adniinis- • trator has been appointed. The mother -and her son-in-law -made disbursements, claimed to amount to between $1,600.and $1,700, in connection with the sickness, death and burial of her son. She x seeks to have these expenses reimbursed to her out of the funds in question, and the wife opposes it. •
The mother who proposes to accept the benefits, of the pro-, visions made in the trust- deed in her behalf, with-reference to the. . disposition of the principal remaining on hand at. the death of her son, is certainly in no position to dispute its validity. Under
Ordered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.