New York Supreme Court, 1899

Israel v. Israel

Israel v. Israel
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1899 · Gildersleeve
28 Misc. 57; 59 N.Y.S. 800

Counsel

Gruggenheimer, Untermyer & Marshall (Moses Weinman, of counsel), for motion., Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson (Eugene Treadwell, of counsel), opposed.

Israel v. Israel

Opinion of the Court

Gildersleeve, J.

There are two actions — one by the wife, Tillie B. Israel, against her husband, Abraham Israel, for a separation on the ground of cruel and inhuman conduct, and the other, by the husband against the wife, for divorce on the ground of adultery. Alimony and counsel fee is asked in each case. In separation cases it is not my custom to allow alimony, for the reason that the police courts provide the wife with every means to compel her husband to furnish her with proper support and maintenance, and there is no reason why such applications should be made to the Supreme Court. I, therefore, deny the motion in the separation case, without costs and without prejudice to police remedies. As for the divorce case, in which the wife is defendant, the rule is that, where the wife denies on oath the charge of adultery, she will be allowed alimony and counsel fee, even though the husband submits affidavits in support of the charge, as so important a question should not be decided on conflicting affidavits, but should await the termination of the action; unless, indeed, the wife’s guilt appears established beyond all reasonable doubt. See Frickel v. Frickel, 4 Misc. Rep. 382; 24 N. Y. Supp. 483. In the case at bar the wife does deny, on oath, the charge, and' it cannot be said that her guilt is established beyond all reasonable doubt. The motion in the divorce case is, therefore, granted. The alimony is fixed at $30 a week, and the counsel fee at the sum of $200.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.