New York Supreme Court, 1899

Ivison v. Ivison

Ivison v. Ivison
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1899 · Gildersleeve
29 Misc. 240; 61 N.Y.S. 118

Counsel

Charles T. Saxton, for plaintiff., No appearance for defendant.

Ivison v. Ivison

Opinion of the Court

Gildersleeve, J.

This is an action for an absolute divorce purporting to be instituted by the wife against the husband. The defendant has allowed his default to be taken. The wife has not been called as a witness, nor is any reason given for her absence. The only witnesses are the defendant and the co-respondent, who testify to the defendant’s adultery. No alimony is asked. There is no evidence of the statutory requirements of an absence of connivance, privity or procurement on the part of the plaintiff, nor even of a desire on her part for a divorce. Under these circumstances the court is not warranted in granting a decree of divorce. The trial will be adjourned until the second Wednesday of November next, when the plaintiff will have an opportunity to be heard, and both parties given an opportunity to convince the court of an absence of connivance or of fraud. An order may be entered restoring the cause to the calendar and setting it down for trial on November 8, 1899,

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.