Watson v. Duncan
Opinion of the Court
This case on appeal is presented to me to be ordered on file. It purports to be settled by stipulation. A case on appeal cannot be settled by stipulation. It must be settled by the trial judge. I cannot settle this case in its present form. The appeal is from a judgment where the court dismissed the complaint on the evidence. The action was to recover damages for personal injuries. A case on appeal should contain no evidence not material to the question to be raised thereby. Yet this case contains even the evidence of the physician of the extent of the injuries. Is it supposed that the judges on appeal must read it? And why? They will only want the-evidence bearing on the questions of negligence, and that in the most compact form. There is much other evidence in this case of an immaterial and frivolous character. Everything which cannot be cited by counsel in- argument as bearing on the questions of negligence should be omitted. The one desire of appellate judges-is to get to the point. Oan counsel for an appellant think he helps his appeal by making it necessary for them to grope through irreler vant and frivolous matter in order to get to the point? And why
The application to order the case on file is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.