New York Supreme Court, 1899

Sprague v. Engelbrecht

Sprague v. Engelbrecht
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1899 · Smith
29 Misc. 464; 61 N.Y.S. 952

Counsel

George J". Greenfield, for plaintiff., Calvin D. Van Mame, for defendant.

Sprague v. Engelbrecht

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.

If power were granted to make an allowance herein to both plaintiff and defendant I should allow plaintiff $300 and the defendant $200, inasmuch as defendant succeeded upon the ■question whether there should be a sale or an actual partition. As I construe the case, I am not permi^ed to award costs and an ¡allowance to the defendant on actual partition; hence I think it fair that no allowance be granted to the plaintiff. I think if •defendant pays one-half of the plaintiff’s costs, about the same result would be reached as if there had been a sale and allowances made upon the basis above suggested.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.