New York Supreme Court, 1899

Coonrad v. Marriott

Coonrad v. Marriott
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1899 · Hiscook
29 Misc. 739

Counsel

H. S. Willison andD. F. Searle, for plaintiff., J. S. Baker, for defendants.

Coonrad v. Marriott

Opinion of the Court

Hiscook, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without costs on the ground that the contract of sale given by defendant Marriott to the plaintiff Coonrad was not of such a fair, just and equitable character as will be specifically enforced by a court of equity. Seymour v. Delancey, 6 Johns. Ch. 222; Margraf v. Muir, 57 N. Y. 158; Sherman v. Wright, 49 id. 227.

Complaint dismissed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.