Coonrad v. Marriott
Coonrad v. Marriott
64 N.Y.S. 1133
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the contract of sale given by defendant Marriott to the plaintiff, Coonrad, was not of such a fair, just, and equitable character as will be specifically enforced by a court of equity. Seymour v. Delancey, 6 Johns. Ch. 222; Margraf v. Muir, 57 N. Y. 158; Sherman v. Wright, 49 N. Y. 227. Complaint dismissed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.