New York Supreme Court, 1900

In re Feist

In re Feist
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 6, 1900 · Bischoff
2 Liquor Tax Rep. 295
In re Feist

Opinion of the Court

Bischoff, Jr., J.

In opposition to the motion the respondent contends that no evidence was given as to the condition and occupancy of the buildings, as of the date when the application for the certificate was made. Examination of the record shows that *296direct testimony to this fact was brought out. While it was not necessary for the referee to make findings upon the evidence, his findings are supported by the proof, which is sufficient to justify the order prayed for in the petition.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.