New York Supreme Court, 1900

In re Weinberger

New York Supreme Court · Decided April 14, 1900 · Maddox

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 298

Counsel

Abraham, Miller, for petitioner., Holm & Smith, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Maddox, J.:

The averment in the petition (93) negatives the conclusion that the church property is used “exclusively as a church.” It does not appear for what purpose the portion set apart for the sexton’s use is or has been put to (see 9 Misc. 250; 14 Misc. 178).

Motion denied, but without prejudice to a renewal, if petitioner shall be so advised. No costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.