Bemus v. Thrall
Opinion of the Court
This is a motion by claimants of surplus moneys arising from sale of mortgaged premises to charge the claimant Brigham N. Thrall with the payment of costs.
Upon the motion .to confirm the report of the referee in this proceeding, which was unopposed, an order was made confirming the same and charging Thrall, personally, with the payment o± $250 costs. That order has been, by stipulation, so far vacated as to permit the claimant Thrall to be heard on the question of costs, and that question has now been presented by counsel both on the part of the claimants and Thrall. Thrall claimed, the whole surplus as the holder of a subsequent mortgage executed by Thrall & Beck, the owners of the equity of redemption under the mortgage foreclosed. The referee, after a protracted hearing or trial, reached the conclusion and decided that the mortgage under which Thrall claimed was given without consideration and to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of Thrall & Peck, and was, as to the creditors of Thrall & Peck, fraudulent and void. The dis
The order heretofore made requiring Thrall to pay $250 of such ■costs should stand and an order to that effect may be entered.
Ho costs of this motion besides the ten doEars awarded on the ■confirmation of the referee’s report.
Ordered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.