New York Supreme Court, 1901

Cullinan v. Hermann

Cullinan v. Hermann
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 29, 1901 · Clarke
2 Liquor Tax Rep. 594

Counsel

Herbert H. Kellogg, for plaintiff., J. Mulholland, for defendant Hermann., Boardman, Platt & Soley, for defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company.

Cullinan v. Hermann

Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

A plea of autre fois acquit would be good in a criminal case. But this is a civil action, with a different rule as to proof. Here, preponderance; in the criminal court, beyond a reasonable doubt. The parties are different. The People, in one case, asking for fine and imprisonment, based upon conviction of a crime. Here, the commissioner suing on a bond against principal and surety on money judgment on a contract.

The motion is granted, $10 costs to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.