New York Supreme Court, 1901

Schmidt v. McCaffrey

Schmidt v. McCaffrey
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1901 · Gayuor
70 N.Y.S. 1011; 34 Misc. 693 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Edward L. Frost, for plaintiff., . John B. Merrill, for defendant.

Schmidt v. McCaffrey

Opinion of the Court

GAYUOR, J.

Section 538 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that “a sham answer or a sham defence may be stricken out,” etc. This distinguishes an “answer” and a “defence'’ as separate things in the terminology of pleading, whereas the term “answer” includes the term “defence,” An answer may consist of a denial or denials only, or of a “defence” only, or of both. Code Civ. Proc. § 500. But a denial cannot be struck out as sham, i. e., false, but only a “defence.” Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281. This serves to illustrate the. differ*1012ence in terminology between a “denial” and a defence.” The inexact and Unscientific language of the Code ought to be that a “defence” may be struck out as sham. There are no defences pleaded here, but only a general denial.

The motion is denied, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.