New York Supreme Court, 1903

In re Cullinan

In re Cullinan
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 20, 1903 · Leventritt
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 237

Counsel

E. E. Kellogg, for petitioner., Eobn Smith, for respondent.

In re Cullinan

Opinion of the Court

Leventritt, J.

I find myself in accord with Mr. Justice Bisckoff's carefully considered opinion and conclusion in People ex rel. Cullinan v. Neus (L. J. August 8, 1903) and accept its reasoning as controlling here. The court must in any event take proof of the facts, and the power to order a reference for that purpose is inherent without any express provision. Petitioner may take an order of reference, the motion for the final order thereafter to be made on the usual notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.