New York Supreme Court, 1906

McConihe v. Gies

McConihe v. Gies
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1906 · Bischoff
52 Misc. 54; 102 N.Y.S. 257

Counsel

Warren McConihe of counsel for plaintiff, and also for Bernhard Gies, life tenant, and Elizabeth Gies Meyer, a remainderman, defendants., Louis Wendel, Jr., for defendant, Joseph Gies, a remainderman.

McConihe v. Gies

Opinion of the Court

Bischoff, J.

The moving defendant seeks an assignment of the mortgage not for the actual protection of his interests in the foreclosure suit, but to give him an advantage in controlling the ultimate disposal of the property as against other parties equally interested.

The court has discretion to refuse subrogation when sought by motion in an action for foreclosure (McLean v. Tompkins, 16 Abb. Pr. 24), and the facts before me lead to the conclusion that the motion should be denied, upon the plaintiff’s stipulating to take no further proceedings in this action pending the termination of the partition suit.'

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.