New York Supreme Court, 1909

N. Dain's Sons Co. v. Thomas McNally Co.

N. Dain's Sons Co. v. Thomas McNally Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1909 · Tompkins
65 Misc. 161; 119 N.Y.S. 625

Counsel

Franklin Couch, for motion., Nathan P. Bushnell, opposed.

N. Dain's Sons Co. v. Thomas McNally Co.

Opinion of the Court

Tompkins, J.

Under a long line of authorities the allegation in the affidavit of Frank M. Dain that the defendant is a foreign corporation, without giving the source of affiant’s knowledge, or showing facts justifying him in making averment based upon personal knowledge, is insufficient; and for that reason the court lacked jurisdiction to grant the warrant of attachment.

The courts have held that a warrant of attachment may be amended to make it conform to the facts stated in the affidavit, but I find no authority for an amendment by an affidavit supplying, facts that were essential to the court’s exercise of jurisdiction in the first instance. On the con*162trary, the authorities seem to be the other way. Because of the insufficiency of the affidavits upon which the warrant of attachment was granted I must grant the motion.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.